[RES·PRE]
Quelques tweets de Bruno Latour à propos du croisement [RES·PRE] :
Constant mistake about AIME is to believe that modes can be detected without first a close study of associations, hence crossing [NET·PRE].
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015Law is a good case to see why networks have to be spread out before [LAW] as a mode may be detected, have a look at http://t.co/AWgta1fJmc
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015Our fault was to publish the book as if the doc column was an addon, but the project starts from ANT type descriptions then focuses on modes
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015Crossing [NET·PRE] is very visible in law since it is so permeable to all influences (detected by ANT) while connecting it in a specific way
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015ANT is very good at catching multiple influences on law as a domain, but not at detecting what makes [LAW] a specific connector of entities.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015ANT isn't 'betrayed' by AIME: from day 1 it's the same project to redescribe society as ANT associations & then to add types of connecting.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015It's because society isn't made in social that it should be described thru opposite tools, 1 to follow associations, 1 to detect connectors.
— AIME (@AIMEproject) 31 Janvier 2015PS: les "modes of existence" sont encore appelés parfois "connecteurs", comme dans ce texte: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/328